Learning from Failure: Myths and Misguided Assumptions about IS Disciplinary Knowledge - Grand Successes and Failures in IT: Public and Private Sectors Access content directly
Conference Papers Year : 2013

Learning from Failure: Myths and Misguided Assumptions about IS Disciplinary Knowledge

Linda Levine
  • Function : Author
  • PersonId : 1001544

Abstract

Many different methods have been used to understand the field of information systems, including classification, citation, and exploration of genres and lines of discourse. This paper discusses an approach based on the concept of a family of fields, where IS has greater proximity to some fields than to others.Our approach was inspired by field theory and discourse communities as a means to explain the diffusion of scientific research. The family of fields concept proved not to be viable but yielded important lessons for the study of IS and its relationship with other scientific fields. We found that (1) fields are not so easily defined, (2) borrowing of ideas across disciplines is not linear, (3) the concept of a reference discipline is obscured, and (4) we need to ask, what are the requirements for a discipline among the social sciences.
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
978-3-642-38862-0_31_Chapter.pdf (507.23 Ko) Télécharger le fichier
Origin : Files produced by the author(s)
Loading...

Dates and versions

hal-01467798 , version 1 (14-02-2017)

Licence

Attribution

Identifiers

Cite

Tor J. Larsen, Linda Levine. Learning from Failure: Myths and Misguided Assumptions about IS Disciplinary Knowledge. InternationalWorking Conference on Transfer and Diffusion of IT (TDIT), Jun 2013, Bangalore, India. pp.495-509, ⟨10.1007/978-3-642-38862-0_31⟩. ⟨hal-01467798⟩
199 View
174 Download

Altmetric

Share

Gmail Facebook X LinkedIn More